Sep 19, 2025
AQMN has filed Freedom of Information (FOI) applications to uncover how small and medium enterprises were treated in the Digital Marketplace Panel 2 (DMP2) procurement process. The aim: ensure transparency around evaluation, compliance, and access barriers for SMEs.
DMP2 is the federal government’s major procurement platform for digital and ICT services. Its design promises broader SME access, transparency, and fair competition. Digital Transformation Agency+1 However, manufacturers and suppliers have raised concerns about how evaluators applied rules, how categories were assigned, and whether terms favored incumbents.
By lodging FOI applications, AQMN seeks internal records, evaluation criteria, correspondence, and internal guidance that may demonstrate whether SMEs were disadvantaged or unfairly filtered out.
The FOI requests focus on key areas:
With this data, AQMN aims to benchmark what actually occurred against the published DMP2 rules and help clients respond to future rounds or challenge process errors.
AQMN’s filings leverage its experience in procurement law, transparency regimes, and Commonwealth process. The team structured requests to target non-exempt records (i.e., those that should be subject to disclosure). Where records are withheld, AQMN is prepared to review refusal notices, lodge internal reviews, and escalate to the Information Commissioner if necessary.
This approach is not just about transparency, it supports clients in seeing risk in past procurements and shaping future bids with informed strategy.
Whether good-faith clarification or rebuttal steps were followed for SMEs.
With that knowledge, AQMN can help clients prepare stronger bids, identify grounds for review, or make representations backed by internal documents rather than guesswork.
Transparency is essential in procurement, especially when smaller players depend on equal access. AQMN’s FOI actions reinforce that scrutiny over major platforms like DMP2 is not optional. It’s necessary for market fairness, policy confidence, and accountability of evaluation outcomes.